The lawsuit between Oracle and Google on the use of Java technology in Android and any license fees to pay and continues the arguments of each side develop. Google not communicating precise figures on the Android activity, assessing the amount of compensation that Google should pay in the event of an adverse decision is difficult to estimate.
An internal document of the first group of Mountain View provided the court suggests that Android has cost much more in 2010 and part of 2011 he reported. In fact, it would invalidate compensation based on revenue generated by Android.
Note that Google offered before trial an amicable agreement precisely incorporating a percentage of revenue generated by Android. Such an agreement would have avoided paying any fee for its work by mid-2011 outside a small compensation of $ 3 million.
But lawyers for the publisher database refused this proposal and challenged the assessment provided by the document presented to the court. Judge Alsup, in charge of the case, has asked Google to provide accounting records at the root of the assessment at issue, the testimony of the author to clarify this information.
Oracle has shown that although Google has knowingly taken the skeleton of the Java technology to create Android and has not paid the required fees. The publisher is seeking hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, as it did a year ago as part of the case involving SAP TomorrowNow, when Google believes this is a case a few million dollars.
Android is now the leading global mobile platform and has a base of hundreds of millions of devices. The stakes are enormous, as are the amounts committed in case of victory of Oracle.
You have read this article older
with the title Google vs. Oracle: the judge wants to know how much revenue does Android. You can bookmark this page URL https://angryblackmf.blogspot.com/2012/05/google-vs-oracle-judge-wants-to-know.html. Thanks!
No comment for "Google vs. Oracle: the judge wants to know how much revenue does Android"
Post a Comment